THE CULTURE WAR

-8-

"I intend to go right on appointing highly qualified individuals of the highest personal integrity to the bench, individuals who understand the danger of short-circuiting the electoral process and disenfranchising the people through judicial activism."  - Ronald Reagan

***THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN AMERICA TODAY***

CHINA HAD THE GANG OF FOUR; AMERICA, THE FEDERAL GANG OF EIGHT: One (1) District Court Judge, (2 of 3) Circuit Court of Appeals Judges; and Four + One Supreme Court Justices working in consort with the Rule of Four and Writ of Certiorari!

Note: All of this 8 and 7 can be applied to the separate States. The same liberal activism can be from one STATE  jurist or STATE Supreme Court who circumvent the TRUE WILL OF THE PEOPLE as set forth in any state Constitution, legislative and administrative governance, and the STATE Constitutional Amendments only to change such.

Federalism relies on limited government and TRUE STATES RIGHTS, not the whim of A FEW liberal justices without Amendment to their respective Constitutions.

DO NOT be fooled by pseudo-Constitutional "scholars" like Beirut Hussein Osama who seem to think "states rights" lies in the will of the liberal judiciary and ACLJeU only!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_four

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari#United_States_Law

See Breyer (Gore classmate!), Ginsburg (ACL-Jew Council!), Souter (Bush 41 bullshit artist), Kennedy (Bork left-over from the 9th District Court of Appeals . . . go figure),  or Stevens (the dinosaur) now!

See Brennan, Blackman, Marshall, Warren, Douglas before!

See Black, Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge plus one before them!

"In regards to this law in Tennessee, upon which Scopes is being adjudged, it need hardly be said that this law did not have its origin in bigotry. It is not trying to force any form of religion on anybody. The majority is not trying to, as the Establishment Clause prohibits, establish a religion or to teach it. The majority is trying to protect itself from the effort of an insolent minority to force irreligion upon the children under the guise of teaching science. . . . What right has a little irresponsible oligarchy of self-styled, elitist, “intellectuals” to demand control of the schools of the United States, in which 25 million children are being educated at the annual expense of nearly two billion dollars of our taxpayer money? Christians must, in every State of the Union, rally to the polls, and build their own colleges in which to teach Christianity; it is only simple justice that atheists, agnostics and other unbelievers should build their own colleges if they want to teach their own religious views or attack the religious views of others." - William Jennings Bryan (1926) from "The Cowardly Lion"

Fighting the evil that is modern, progressive, insolent, liberalism's judicial stranglehold on Americanism and Christian values.

-7-

Here are SEVEN (7) steps showing how the modern, liberal, Judicial Activist, Culture War is strategically managed.

NOTE: Again, Federalism relies on limited government and TRUE STATES RIGHTS, not the whim of liberal justices without Amendment to their respective Constitutions. The same holds true within EACH STATE. This federal 8 and 7 is the nuclear option of the liberals whose one or two judicial activists in their states do not OVERTURN the true will of the people set forth by people by Amendment or legislature.

STATES RIGHTS RESIDE IN THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND LEGISLATURES NOT 3 pro-Homo/baby killing. liberal Jewish justices!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism

STEP 1. Should your respective liberal State Supreme Court not overturn morality and create progressive/Jewish Stare Decisis, pick a federal District Court (trial) judge. Oh, how about a N. California (San Francisco, what a stretch!) 9th District Court judge, who is, of course, liberal and an ally, and will try and automatically rule in the liberal's favor! Just have the ACLU, SPLC, TERRORIST MUSLIMS or ADL (or any other anti-Christian liberals), present a federal law, or state law, or a local statute, or a company policy, or even a Church/charitable policy  they HATE . . . Or, let's say, that homosexuals, (even) CAIR TERROR PEOPLE, illegal Wetbacks, atheists, socialists and other Jews, baby killers; or other anti-Christian/Christmas/Christ, anti-death penalty, anti-traditional family, anti-American, anti-NRA leftist don't like to a Federal District Court . . . This is real easy, the liberal judges (Or even those who will become yet another, liberal, stare decisis seeking, progressive, Jew 'friend of the Court' like Abe Fortas [was] but -- ha, ha, --  who went on the Supreme Court only to resign in shame!) WANT it in a federal trial -- and not 10th Amendment States' Rights -- so you are not pressed on the 10th Amendment/state-federal issue with the liberal judges! They will accept almost any case to block ANY thing to do with God, Christians, Home Schooling, America First, traditional morality, etc!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abe_fortis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._District_Courts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California

See Michael Newdow (Newdow) for the most patent example! He was shot down at the District level but he had a safe harbor . . . the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Newdow

The liberals -- like any Talmudic, ACLU, SPLC, or ADL Jew -- know the liberal District Courts will rule, or should rule, in their favor on any ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-BILL OF RIGHTS, Pro- PROGRESSIVE, SOCIAL ENGINEERING ISSUE, hoping for "vertical stare decisis," (i.e., Precedent either by trial [District], appeal [Circuit] or Supreme Court.) outside of their purview on so-called "progressive issues," completely unrelated to their  expertise, but completely related to their anti-American liberalism. This IS legislating (Talmudic) amorality from the Bench!

Read Judge Byron White's minority opinions on legislation from the Bench in Roe v. Wade, and so forth, and Antonin Scalia especially.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron_White

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonin_Scalia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stare_decisis

So now a small, insolent (many, many are Jewish) minority -- using federal/legal-terrorist/Judicial Activism to violate, and circumvent Checks and Balances, States Rights, Federalism, and Separation of Powers -- are tearing the Constitution to shreds. Exiling it more likely, and all under the guise of calling it a living document. Well, if it's living, then like the Tibetan Monks or Thomas Sowell would say, it's dying!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checks_and_balances

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism#United_States

Even at this level and up, the contra-positive for liberals is to take laws passed in the state that liberals support, and use the same illegal route to get them to Federal levels. Thus, their ONE STATE law must become Federal law for all states or "horizontal stare decisis" a different route from their "vertical stare decisis" as mentioned above . . .  So-called HOMOSEXUAL "marriage" in one damn state is the perfect example and the mostly Jewish, progressive liberals falsely scream "States Rights!" or "Federalism!" and then mutter  "stare decisis" as they try to envoke in to all REAL AMERICANS; when in reality they are screaming "Liberal Oligarchy" and either misusing or destroying Constitutional Clauses they see fit to abuse, use or eschew!!

The U.S. Constitution IS in exile (not living) as the Culture War goes on!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_in_Exile

Four examples of liberal, Judicial, Activists misusing clauses:

E.g. 1 (Ruby Ridge): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_clause

[There is a good (but not all) list of clauses at the bottom of the Supremacy Clause]

E.g. 2 (Mexican Wetbacks):  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenship_Clause

E.g. 3 (Eminent Domain, Private Use, and the Privacy Clauses):  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takings_Clause#United_States

E.g. 4 (The 10th Amendment): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause

STEP 2. But if you can't find a sympathetic District Court Judge to overturn the law or state statute, clause or not, then appeal to sympathetic, liberal, appellate judges such as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Again, San Francisco, where else?); who order a  Writ of Certiorari (CERT), and, in turn, appoints 3 judges, (of the 28 judges over 60% are now liberals appointed by Carter/Clinton! Do the math . . .) who will either overturn a law ONLY A FEW sick humans do not like, or will rule in favor of the most ludicrous, pro-progressive litigation in order to "open new ground," id est, socially engineer by the aforementioned "legislating (Talmudic) amorality from the bench."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari#United_States_Law

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_court_of_appeals

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit

Newdow then appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to murder the Pledge of Allegiance, and of course, was victorious by a whopping 2-1 margin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Newdow

STEP 3. The Supreme Court's Gang of Four + One then either refuses to review, or even if a Cert is ordered, refuse to overturn the view of only one (1) liberal District Court Judge, or two-three (2 of3) liberal, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' Judges! Or, in most cases BOTH!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari#United_States_Law

In Newdow's case, it was shot down and even the scum Democrats saw this insanity and the Supreme Court overturned the 9th's ruling (that happens 80% of the time, what does that tell you?)

STEP 4. But the circular attack on God, Christians, the unborn, gun rights, free speech, real Americans, and American traditional morality does not stop there. YET ANOTHER LIBERAL, District Court Judge, Lawrence Karlton (God only knows where this liberal asshole was from; and even though yet another 9th Circuit Court of Appeals lousy rulin, id est, Newdow, was over turned by the U.S. Supreme Court and lambasted even by Democrats) Karlton used the Newdow Pledge of Allegiance case as PRECEDENT for ruling the Pledge of Allegiance as UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and now must be appealed again to a U.S.  District Court of Appeal, probably the 9th again, then off again the Supreme Court! GET IT? ON AND ON UNTIL THEY WEAR YOUR DOWN. THIS IS TALMUDIC/TROTSKY/LENINISM. Only, if you are conservative seeking justice you are shot down at the District Court for some ludicrous reason (e.g., Mary McCorvey, a.k.a. JANE ROE was told too much time has passed!), and even if you appeal, it will then be denied by the liberals as the appellate level of any of the Circuit Courts of Appeal, then eventually, even if the rule of four gets it there denied by the Rule of Four + One! 

STEP 5. Checks to this rampage of the Talmudic, Culture War oligarchy is simple. But it only takes one or two liberal Democrats in key positions in Congress (and they are ALL party to this GANG OF NINE!) to halt ANY Congressional Checks to  this "legislating (amorality) from the bench."

And with insolent minority idiots like the Harry Reid, BERNIE Sanders, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Waxman, Wasserman, Wexler, Schumer, Durbin, Blumenauer, Beirut Osama, Strap-on Hillary, Boxer, Harkin, LIEberman, Feingold, Levin, Feinstein,  Hoyer, and Nancy "Baltimore Botox" Pelosi (San Francisco, where else?) the odds are slim and none, and slim left town.

This is a GREAT article on the subject of Congressional Checks of Judicial Activism by Edwin Meese (AG - Reagan, 1981-88).

http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/queerlaw-edit/msg00188.html

Read the article but here are some highlights about how Congress can check this insanity:

1. The Senate should use its confirmation authority to block the appointment of activist federal judges. Not now with that nut Leahy supporting them on the Judiciary Committee!

2.. Congress should strip the (LIBERAL) American Bar Association of its special role in the judicial selection process. Not now, they are all lawyers!

3. Congress should exercise its power to limit the jurisdiction of the federal courts.

Congress has great control over the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts. Article III, Section 1, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."

[Emphasis added.] It is well-established that since Congress has total discretion over whether to create the lower federal courts, it also has great discretion over the jurisdiction of those courts it chooses to create. In fact, Congress has in the past withdrawn jurisdiction from the lower federal courts when it became dissatisfied with their performance or concluded that state courts were the better forum for certain types of cases. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld Congress's power to do so.

4. The states should press Congress to amend the Constitution in a way that will allow the states to ratify constitutional amendments in the future without the approval of Congress.

One reason judicial activism is so dangerous and undemocratic is that reversing or amending federal court decisions is so difficult. When a decision by the Supreme Court or a lower federal court is based on the
Constitution, the decision cannot be reversed or altered except by a constitutional amendment. Such constitutional decisions are immune from presidential vetoes or congressional legislation.

Judges with life tenure show less restraint when their chances of being overruled by constitutional amendment are slight.

5. Congress should stop the federalization of crime and the expansion of
litigation in federal court.

Whenever Congress enacts a new federal criminal statute or a statute creating a cause-of-action in federal court, it enlarges the power and authority of the federal courts and provides more opportunities for judicial activism. At the same time, the federalization of crimes that have traditionally concerned state and local governments upsets the balance between the national government and the states. The following steps can help reduce the federalization of the law and once again restore balance to the federal-state relationship.

WILL IT HAPPEN, OR DO WE THROW THE TEA IN THE HARBOR? BE CAREFUL!

STEP 6. Working in lock-step to stop any Congressional Checks to rampant liberal Judges -- and in sync with this liberal, Jewish, Talmudic, judicial activist attack -- is the multi-media (I.E., ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/MSNBC/TIME/NEWSWEEK/NY TIMES/LA TIMES/WASHINGTON POST/CABLE TV/HOLLYWOOD, et al) who cover it up and issue ad hominem attacks on us. Again, it's the liberal, litigious, legal groups like the ACLU, ADL, SPLC, GLAAD, PLANNED PARENTHOOD, and CAIR who will sue you and probably present the cases to the District Courts in the first place!! Add the Internet Gestapo (Soros/Clinton's Media Matters who monitors and gives the talking points to (Note: there are 600 known e-mails that go to mostly Jews -- and other liberal pols -- in all the media from Media Matters, DAILY! See Don Imus.) : TMZ, Drudge Report, Salon, Slate, The Smoking Gun, MoveOn.org, Chris "Neverland" Matthews, Donny Deutch, Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Stephen "Daddy, tell Tyrone the plane is gonna crash!" Colbert, Code Pink, Ariana "Why Mike Went Fag" Huffington's clap-trap, The View, Oprah, David Letterman, the DNC, the Hollywood 100, fat women on TV, liberal Blog hogs in general, etc.) who then falsely attack those who expose it, and are then lent publicity by the aforementioned multi-media.

STEP 7. Finally, radical, anti-American, left wing, pseudo-academic liberal whites and their minority-student, Peter Principle lackeys, will now ruin academic standards and reputations, physically attack those of you who would speak freely of the Culture War publicly. And they do so under the odd guise of free speech, hoping they will destroy anyone who fights this war against Culture War and Judicial Activism, no matter the subject for that matter. Witness Norman Finkelstein and the Minutemen!

BE VERY MAD, ARM UP, TAKE AIM, KNOW ALL THE ABOVE ENEMIES AND GET READY TO REACT! FOR YOU NOW SEE THEY ALL  ARE OUR "ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC" IN:

THE CULTURE WAR

ROOTS . . . THE CULTURE WARS GREATEST GENERATION