From Robert Bork, to Mel Gibson, to Don Imus, the Tamudic Jews -- e.g., George Soros, Gate, Buffet, Diller -- who control the national media want to silence the truth about them. They are always willing to get others to do their work for them!.

***Of course Imus will be back on F.M., a suitcase full of cash in hand, the liberals need him to spew their psycho-babble for the 2008 general election season. Everyone else, good or bad, is a so-called conservative!!***

That idiot Les Mooves of CBS has lost: 1) Howard Stern, 2) Don Imus, and 3) Bernie Mac then gets himself intimidated and blackmailed by the unmentionable, processed, charlatan pictured above who should be serving time for past connivances. We will see just how much of a man Don Imus is when it is payback time to the liberals in the press and politics who nearly ruined his career and abandoned him in his time of attack.

Don Imus was the only main-stream, talk radio, mouth-piece for all Democrats. And since Zell Miller is gone, Imus had mostly liberal Democrats; of whom many, many were liberal, Jewish Democrats!!

Among his recurring liberal guests were (known Jewish Democrats in Marxist/Zionist red):  Joe Liberman, Jew; Christopher Dodd, Dem; Chuck Schumer, Jew; Dan Abrams; Jew; Howard Fineman, Jew; George Carlin, Dem; Doris Kearns Goodwin, Dem; David Gregory, Jew; Joe Biden, Dem; Kinky Friedman, Jew;  Maureen Dowd, Dem; Frank Rich, Jew; Tom Brokaw, Dem; Dan Rather, MORON; Evan Thomas, Dem; Tony Kornheiser, Jew; Chris Matthews, Dem; Thomas Friedman, Jew; Anna Quindlen, Dem; Jonathan Alter, Jew; Mike Barnicle, Dem; Andrea Kramer, Jew; Tim Russert, Dem; Michael Beschloss, Dem; Paul Begala, Dem; Jeff Greenfield, Jew; John Kerry, Dem; John McCain, A Corrupt Keating Five RINO; A Nappy-Headed, Redbone Negro Named Harold Ford, Jr., Who Once Tried to OJ (Strangle) a White Conservative Woman on the House Floor, Dem; Mike Lupica, Jew; James Carville, Dem; George Stepanopolous, Dem; Howard Kurtz, Jew; Craig Crawford, Dem; Bill Bradley, Dem; Michael Isikoff, Jew; and on and on and on.

 Get it? The media, historians, money, power, Jews = all the liberal Democrats heard on Imus!

The same Jews at the Soros/Clinton Media Matters, and MoveOn.org are also the B'nai B'rith, ADL, JDL Christ-killers who followed Mel Gibson for weeks, then had a Jew cop, James Mee, set Gibson up! All the while liberal-leaning, Jewish, homosexual, muckraker  Matt Drudge (63% of all his links are to liberal sites!) is just the blog spreader they have needed to assassinate any and all Christian dissent!

[SIDEBAR: Paris Hilton needs think long and hard about how she was quoted as making anti-Jew and anti-black remarks just BEFORE she got her DUI then VOP! The L.C.S.D. and the L.A.P.D. has in its midst para-military units such as the S.I.S. and many are controlled by Jews like Foxman and the ADL!]

In a recent survey it was proven that 50% of all anti-Christian/American, communist, radicals in America were Jews, and that 20% of all Jews were anti-Christian/American radicals! And, according to Hoyle, the majority of ALL media is either run by (e.g., Owners and CEOs), or controlled by (e.g., Editors and Reporters), these same Jews!

How liberals Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, George Soros, David Brock, Code Pink, TMZ. com, Matt Drudge, MoveOn.org, The Hollywood 100, Media Matters, and other Jews, got Don Imus:

FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:

[SIDEBAR I] Leave it to Democrats to cut off their nose to spite their face. Losing Imus ("Chained Heat" Hilly is a vindictive, Wellesley witch; and even worse, a protégée of radical, communist Jew Saul Alinsky and now Jewish George Soros!) is the best thing to happen to the conservative voice since that RINO Barry Goldwater, Sr. croaked.]

[SIDEBAR II] It should also be noted that Media Matters' Founder and CEO (though funded mostly by Soros it IS Hillary and Bill's character assassination machine) is the  defrocked, Jewish, former, red diaper baby, Berkeley newspaper editor; turned Jewish NEOCON attack dog; turned extremist, Jewish, left-wing liberal who is now the right-wing watchdog guru. Meet David "Ryan, Can I Suck Your Cock?" Brock, who wrote "The Real Anita Hill," broke the Toopergate scandal; and outed the Paula Jones attempted rape by Clinton. That ultimately led to Clintion's Impeachment and disbarment for perjury, and the discovery of Bill "The Ice Man" Clinton's rape of Juanita Broaddrick. 

(IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT MEDIA MATTERS HAS OVER 600 MULTI-MEDIA CONTACTS THEY E-MAIL DAILY WITH THEIR PROPAGANDA. SO WHO ARE THEY? THE GUESS IS THAT MOST ARE JEWS OR PROGRESSIVES WHO RUN OR OWN THE MAJORS NETWORKS AND PRINT MEDIA, WHO, IN-TURN, GOOSE-STEP TO WHATEVER SOROS/CLINTON'S TELLS THEM TOO! IMUS, LIKE LIMBAUGH, MEL GIBSON, PARIS HILTON, ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE TERROR THESE PEOPLE USE!)

UNHORSED JOCKEY
Behind the Fall of Imus, A Digital Brush Fire

In a Blur, Watchdogs, Blogs, Email, Spur Radio Host’s Firing

By BROOKS BARNES, EMILY STEEL and SARAH MCBRIDE
April 13, 2007; Page A1

At 6:14 a.m. on Wednesday, April 4, relatively few people were tuned into the “Imus in the Morning Show”
when Don Imus referred to the Rutgers women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed ho’s.”

Ryan Chiachiere was. A 26-year-old researcher in Washington, D.C., for liberal watchdog organization
Media Matters for America, he was assigned to monitor Mr. Imus’s program. Mr. Chiachiere clipped the video,
alerted his bosses and started working on a blog post for the organization’s Web site…

On the morning of the original broadcast, there was little response to Mr. Imus’s slur. Media Matters
posted the video and transcript on its Web site and sent an email blast to several hundred reporters, as
it does nearly every day. The post received dozens of comments, many heated, some more than 300 words long.
The next day, top news outlets didn’t mention the incident.

On Thursday, at about 3 p.m., NBC News President Steve Capus was conducting a routine planning meeting in his third-floor offices at Rockefeller Center when an assistant interrupted him to take an urgent phone
call, according to a person at the meeting. On the other line: MSNBC General Manager Dan Abrams. Mr.
Abrams said MSNBC executives were fielding complaints from viewers and employees who had seen a video clip of Mr. Imus’s remark on the Media Matters site, this person says.

The group is a Web-based nonprofit organization devoted to monitoring “conservative misinformation” in
print, broadcast, cable, radio and Internet media outlets. It frequently complains about Rush Limbaugh
and Bill O’Reilly. Although the Imus show isn’t generally considered conservative, some of its guests
are…

[SIDEBAR: Some? Three: Buchanan, Ingraham, and Coulter. Oh, by the way, the only three to not bury Imus!]

In Chicago, Bryan Monroe, president of the National Association of Black Journalists, saw an email sent by
one of his executive board members at 5:06 p.m. “FYI —do we need to address” read the subject line. It was
the Media Matters post.

Mr. Monroe, editorial director of Johnson Publishing Co. in charge of Ebony and Jet magazines, wasn’t a
regular reader of Media Matters or an Imus listener…

A quick Googling of Ryan Chiachiere shows you exactly the kind of people who we are dealing with.
Professional DNC hacks.

Among Mr. Chiachiere’s amazing feats is his “research” exposing Tom Delay’s many crimes against humanity. Or rather, inventing them.

But as we have noted before, Media Matters is supported and even staffed by Clinton cronies. So they
would make natural handmaidens for such a deed.

Certainly Media Matters has been carefully keeping score:

Imus smeared Hillary Clinton, "that buck-toothed witch, Satan" Wed, May 24, 2006

On the May 24 edition of MSNBC’s Imus in the Morning, host Don Imus referred to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) as "Satan" 11 times, once calling her "that buck-tooted witch, Satan." During an interview with
NBC News chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell, Imus even claimed that Clinton was "worse
than" Osama bin Laden, but then partially retracted his statement, saying: "Well, that’s a little strong."

Imus has repeatedly and unapologetically referred to Clinton as "Satan," most recently during the May 22,
23, and 24 editions of his radio program. During a conversation with co-host Charles McCord and executive
producer Bernard McGuirk on May 22, Imus admitted that he "wouldn’t have a job based on stuff" he had said in the past, adding that, however, he had never had to apologize for insulting former President Bill Clinton
and his "fat ugly wife," Satan…

But of course Hillary’s grudge against Imus goes back further than last year. It probably traces back to at
the annual DC Radio and TV Correspondents Association dinner 11 years ago.

Once again we are indebted to Media Matters for the damning quotes:

Imus had barely begun his routine when words such as "indicted," "subpoena," "Go, baby," "AstroTurf in the
pickup" and "pot-smoking weasel" came spilling out of his mouth. The president and first lady, seated on the
dais, were forced to maintain their composure in front of three thousand spectators and the television
cameras. — Page 97, "The Way to Win: Taking the White House in 2008" by Mark Halperin and John Harris.

But now that Hillary and her cohorts at Media Matters have Don Imus’s scalp, they will be further
emboldened. Indeed, as we have noted, they are already moving on to their next targets.

Still, are these really the people we want serving as gatekeepers of the public airwaves?

The Real David Brock - Christopher Hitchens

(From www.thenation.com  Posted: May, 2002)

When incurable liberals like Todd Gitlin and Eric Alterman begin using the name Whittaker Chambers as a term of approbation, we are entitled to say that there has been what the Germans call a Tendenzwende, or shift in the zeitgeist. The odd thing is that they have both chosen to compare Chambers's Witness, a serious and dramatic memoir by any standards, to a flimsy and self-worshiping book titled Blinded by the Right, by David Brock. Meyer Schapiro, one of the moral heroes of the democratic left, once said that Whittaker Chambers was incapable of telling a lie. That might well be phrasing it too strongly, but I have now been provoked by curiosity into reading Brock, and I would say without any hesitation that he is incapable of recognizing the truth, let alone of telling it.

The whole book is an exercise in self-love, disguised as an exercise in self-abnegation. How could he, asks the author of himself, have possibly gone on so long in telling lies, smearing reputations and inventing facts? The obvious answer--that he adored the easy money and the cheap fame that this brought him--was more than enough to still his doubts for several years. However, his publisher seems to have required a more high-toned explanation before furnishing him with a fresh tranche of money and renown. And Brock's new story--that he was taken in by a vast right-wing conspiracy--is just as much of a lie as his earlier ones.

On page 128, Brock does what many defectors do, and claims that it was his party, not he, that had changed. The tone of the 1992 Republican convention was the alleged tipping point, with its antigay, anti-1960s, Christian Coalition themes.

On page 121 Brock makes the demented assertion that the GOP had "virtually launched an antigay pogrom," before sobbing, "there was far less ideological affinity between the GOP and me than when I had first come to Washington. The party had left me and many other libertarian-leaning conservatives back in Houston." So at least that fixes a date, in what is a very rambling and egocentric narrative. And the date makes it easy to demonstrate that Brock is a phony. His early hero Reagan made alliances with Jerry Falwell, fulminated against the 1960s, refused to mention the term "AIDS" in public and encouraged Jeane Kirkpatrick's veiled attack on the "San Francisco Democrats" in 1984. As a longtime Bay Area denizen, Brock would have had a hard time missing that last reference, or any of the others. So he's plainly still lying about his past. He's also lying about his future: the "Troopergate" allegations appeared under his name a good while later than 1992, and sometime well after that he was billed as a featured speaker by the Christian Coalition.

Who is such a sap as to take the word of such a person? Brock masks his deep-seated mendacity from others and (perhaps) from himself by a simple if contemptible device of rhetoric. He switches between passive and active. Thus of one conservative smear-op, he tells us that "I allowed myself to get mixed up" in it. His masochism even permits him to say, at a reactionary award ceremony in far-off St. Louis, at which he somehow found himself, that "I was miserable. Yet this was how I made my living and it was who I had become. The conservatives had bought my brain." And paid well over the odds for it, I should say. Never mind, he always cheers up by letting himself be drawn in to another bad business. And here we get the same paltry narcissism in its opposite form: "I was a full-scale combatant, I had war-wounds to show for it, and I needed the thrill of another round of battle."

He finds it difficult to refer to himself--when he isn't crippled by self-loathing--without using the words "icon" and "poster boy." There are actually very few revelations in the book, unless you are surprised to learn that a cabal of right-wingers tried to frame the Clintons for killing Vince Foster. (Brock now prefers the even more far-out view that Foster was murdered by the Wall Street Journal.) Referring to the anti-Semitism of a famous conservative, he cites what might be a joke in poor taste and says it was "one of her gentler remarks." What, couldn't he have cited a more damning one?

There are countless silly mistakes, including the date of Theodore and Barbara Olson's wedding, and many innuendoes, such as the (unsupported) suggestion that it is Richard Mellon Scaife who has committed not one but two murders. In his coarse attack on Juanita Broaddrick, whose allegation of rape was supported by several contemporaneous witnesses and has not yet been denied by Clinton himself, Brock does not even do the elementary work of stating the case he is trying to rebut. Instead, he inserts a completely gratuitous slander against a decent woman, all of whose independent assertions have survived meticulous fact-checking. The defamation game is still all that this creep knows. Etiquette requires that I mention a very rude description of myself, concentrating on the grossly physical, which includes the assertion that I am unwashed as well as unkempt. Those who know me will confirm that while I may not be tidy, I am so clean you could eat your dinner off me. Perhaps I did not want to put Mr. Brock to the labor of proving this. At any rate, I am relieved to find I am not his type. However, I forgive him this sophomoric passage because its empty hatred was so obviously feigned after the event, and because it describes me as five years younger than I am.

Still, I wanted to take an extra shower after trudging through this dismally written, pick-nose, spiteful and furtive little book. It glitters with malice and the more cowardly kind of "disclosure"; it's a dank, filthy tissue turned inside out. And it is all written allegedly as a defense of the Clintons' right to privacy! As someone who despised Clinton from the very first, I remember resenting the damage done by hysterical and fabricated right-wing attacks, which bought him time and sympathy. Anyone really interested in this period should grab the paperback version of Michael Isikoff's Uncovering Clinton, a verifiable story told by a serious journalist, who began by disbelieving the rumors and discovered by honest exertion that many of them, and some that had not even been suspected, were true.