CALCONCO
![]()
![]()
America, when you run with the bull(shit) here, you get:
GORED!![]()
Just carrying on a family tradition! Don't forget that these Gore bastards are the ones who helped slaughter the Bonus Army: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army. Read this carefully. Patton, Eisenhower, FDR, Thomas GORE (that's correct) all refused to help, or routed and murdered the WWI Veterans. Gee, maybe dick-smoking Gore Vidal can write about what he saw? Enjoying the show, Mister Lincoln?
Not to mention that the "progressive" Gores have been against EVERY single civil rights and segregation act ever put forth in this nation! Remember how AL Gore, Jr. use to go eat a hamburger while his female House Nigger had to sit in the car? What the hell is that shit? I'll tell you what it is, you are seeing what white share-croppers like my southern (maternal) fore-fathers saw. The plantation masters (Trent Lott to Strom Thurmond) remember the "good 'ole days." Translation, drinking fucking mint juleps while the Negro slaves and the white share-croppers work their asses off, literally for peanuts thanks to a savant, former slave named G. W. Carver.
From Jim Crow, to Roe v. Wade, to Armand Hammer's Communist SLP and Barbara Boxer's Camp Kinderland/Kinder Ring. These redneck, Gore bastards are pronounced: COMMUNIST! More "old blood money" like the Bushes, only this time from murderous communism, not Nazis like the Bushes!
ARMAND HAMMER/AL GORE SR. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armand_Hammer
And guess who pardoned that pro-Abortion, staunch Republican, COMMUNIST, Jew Hammer? Why I declare, Blanche Dubois, it was G. H. W. Bush! The sick son of Prescott (see below).
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM/GORE FAMILY: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occidental_Petroleum_Company
Environmental Democrat? I guess Al Gore, Jr. forgot about the LOVE CANAL!
*From Global Communism . . .
(click picture for citation)
*(From wikipedia) The term "political
correctness" is said to derive from
Marxist-Leninist
vocabulary to describe the
"communist party
line." [sic] It is now used to include
leftist, revisionist indoctrination and control of American linguistics, education, sexuality,
religion, the Myth of Darwinism, the Myth of the BBT, the Myth of Fossil Fuels, The Myth of Global
Warming, and amoral non-tradititonal family values into the Bush/Clinton/Gore/Obama/McCain, atheistic, socialistic "Democratic
party line."
To Global Warming (now a polished turd called CLIMATE
CHANGE) . . .
Great list of Al "Loose Screw" Gore's quotes. A history of outright lies,
illusions, and distortions: http://www.gargaro.com/algore.html
[SIDEBAR:
Good site above. BTW, Miss Gargaro has been there from the start and is more
civil than most!] This crazy, antler dancer, Gore, makes George "Mister Malaprop" Bush look
like William Safire!
**
![]()
![[Image]](http://www.calconco.net/gore.jpg)
10. Bill didn’t inhale, I don’t exhale.
9. Global Warming came to me after the physical act of rolling around in flour
with my wife, Flubber.
8. My Negro house-boy doesn’t cost me many carbon
credits.
7. Barbara Boxer makes me look intelligent, rational, and sane.
6. Flubber and I have been mixing medications, when we can keep the boy out of
the bathroom.
5. People exhaling carbon dioxide in the air causes my
cheeks to puff-up like a dirigible.
4. Sometimes I like to put a fizzie in my daily
Paxil/Prozac/Zofol enema.
3. Eating five bags of fried pork rinds uses less carbon than eating a rack of bar-b-que
ribs.
2. Fucking liberal Jews will go along with anything for money!
1.
" McCain agrees: Global Warming saps and impurifies all of
our
precious bodily fluids.![]()

Al Gore and Global Warming's number one fan. Do you know who he is? They found a copy of "Earth in Balance" open in his cabin. Not only that, he was probably The Zodiac Killer (He taught at UCB at that time, then left right as the killer of 37 people stopped) who terrorized San Fran in the late 60s before he moved back to Chicago and subsequently became [fanfare playing], THE UNABOMBER!
![]()
Like Teddy K. above, here are other notable, politically correct, pro-Global Warming personalities:
They all agree, "IT'S A DONE DEAL: THERE IS GLOBAL WARMING!" "No fucking way, Jose," said Burke. "WHY?" you may ask. 1st) a) Darwinism v. Intelligent Design and Evolution b)
The Big Bang Theory v. Plasma Cosmology c) Global
Warming/Earth in Balance/Silent Spring/Hellstorm Chronicles v.
Sanity d) Oil as a Fossil Fuel v. Abiotic Theory of
Hydrocarbon/Fossil Fuel formation from the Earth's hot mantel e) The U.S. Constitution is a Living Document v. George Washington,
John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, James Madison, Alexander
Hamilton, etc, etc.
Argumentum ad Verecundiam: (authority) the
fallacy of appealing to the testimony of an authority outside his special field.
Anyone can give opinions or advice; the fallacy only occurs when the reason for
assenting to the conclusion is based on following the improper authority.
A. Occasionally, this argument is called the
"argument from prestige" and is based on the belief that prestigious people
cannot be wrong. In these cases, the fallacy is best termed the "snob appeal"
variety of the ad populum.
B. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish
between the ad verecundiam and the ad populum (q.v., ad populum) when the
authority cited is a group with status.
Consider this example from an popular logic text: "Those who say that astrology
is not reliable are mistaken. The wisest men of history have all been interested
in astrology, and kings and queens of all ages have guided the affairs of
nations by it."
C. The informal structure generally has the basic
pattern:
E. Examples of the ad verecundiam fallacy:
1. The brilliant William Jenkins, the recent
Nobel Prize winner in physics, states uncategorically that the flu virus will be
controlled in essentially all of its forms by the year 2,050. The opinion of
such a great man cannot be disregarded. F.
Uses of the ad verecundiam.
A. Proper experts and authorities render valuable
opinions in their fields and, ceteris paribus, should be believed when we are
unable to come to a conclusion on more secure grounds. G.
Non-fallacious examples of the ad verecundiam.
A. Former President Bush said that America would
be much stronger if the people would return to traditional American values, and
indeed he argues that we should.
(From
www.realclearpolitics.com ) April 03, 2007
The heavy condemnatory breathing on the subject of global warming
outdoes anything since high moments of
the Inquisition. A respectable columnist
(Thomas Friedman of The New York Times)
opened his essay last week by writing,
"Sometimes you read something about this
administration that's just so shameful
it takes your breath away." What asphyxiated this critic was the
discovery that a White House official
had edited "government climate reports
to play up uncertainty of a human role
in global warming." The correspondent
advises that the culprit had been an
oil-industry lobbyist before joining the
administration, and on leaving it he
took a job with Exxon Mobil. For those with addled reflexes, here
is the story compressed: (1) Anyone who
speaks discriminatingly about global
warming is conspiring to belittle the
threat. Such people end up (2) working
for Exxon Mobil, a perpetrator of the
great threat the malefactor sought to
distract us from. Critics are correct in insisting that
human enterprises have an effect on
climate. What they cannot at this point
do is specify exactly how great the
damage is, nor how much relief would be
effected by specific acts of natural
propitiation. The whole business is eerily
religious in feel. Back in the 15th
century, the question was: Do you
believe in Christ? It was required in
Spain by the Inquisition that the answer
should be affirmative, leaving to one
side subsidiary specifications. It is required today to believe that
carbon-dioxide emissions threaten the
basic ecological balance. The assumption
then is that inasmuch as a large
proportion of the damage is man-made,
man-made solutions are necessary. But it
is easy to see, right away, that there
is a problem in devising appropriate
solutions, and in allocating
responsibility for them. To speak in very general terms, the
United States is easily the principal
offender, given the size of our country
and the intensity of our use of
fossil-fuel energy. But even accepting
the high per-capita rate of consumption
in the United States, we face the
terrible inadequacy of ameliorative
resources. If the United States were (we
are dealing in hypotheses) to eliminate
the use of oil or gas for power, would
that forfeiture be decisive? Well, no. It would produce about 23
percent global relief, and at a
devastating cost to our economy. As a practical matter, what have
modern states undertaken with a view to
diminishing greenhouse gases? The answer
is: Not very much. What is being done
gives off a kind of satisfaction, of the
kind felt back then when prayers were
recited as apostates were led to the
stake to be burned. If you levied a 100
percent surtax on gasoline in the United
States, you would certainly reduce the
use of it, but the arbiter is there to
say: What is a complementary sacrifice
we can then expect from India and China?
China will soon overtake the United
States in the production of greenhouse
gases. At Kyoto, an effort was made 10 years
ago to allocate proportional reductions
nation by nation. The United States
almost uniquely declined to subscribe to
the Kyoto protocols. Canada, Japan and
the countries of Western Europe
subscribed, but some have already fallen
short of their goals, and all of them
are skeptical about the prospect of
making future scheduled reductions. It
is estimated that if the United States
had subscribed to Kyoto, it would have
cost us $100 billion to $400 billion per
year. There is, now and then, offsetting
good news. The next report from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), we have learned, will be
less pessimistic than earlier reports.
It will predict, e.g., a sea-level
increase of up to 23 inches by the end
of the century, substantially better
than earlier IPCC predictions of 29
inches -- and light-years away from the
20 feet predicted by former Vice
President Al Gore. Meanwhile, the Danish statistician
Bjorn Lomborg said something outside the
hearing of the outraged columnist. He
noted solemnly that any increase in
heat-related deaths should be balanced
against the corresponding decrease in
cold-related deaths. ... We need hope,
and self-confidence. To Global Doping!
Paging Dr. Nick, Paging Dr. Nick!
Valium, Xanax, Vicodin,
Adderall and Soma. Damn, this boy is good! Elvis , eat you heart out! Jesus, this dude is a chip off the
old, Roger "Headache" Clinton, global, commie, doper block. Hell, he is from
Tennessee and must have that Graceland mentality. I guess religion isn't the
opiate of these commie masses! Gee, he should go free, he was in a hybrid car! Weeeeee. He must have gotten into Tipper and Al's medicine cabinet! He should serve time for sure,
like the set-up Paris Hilton, but won't. Maybe
Bush will commute his sentence like Clinton PARDONED his brother, Roger, and PATTY
HEARST; and commuted the sentences of 14 members of the stinkin-Rican, terrorist FALN!
You should have a bit of sympathy for Gore,
III and even Noelle Bush. If you knew that the mega-millions your family was
worth was based on your respective families, PROFITING and ACTIVE participation
in Communism/segregation/Jim Crow/Freemasonry/corporate murder, greed, &
pollution (Gore, Sr.) and
Nazism/abortion/Freemasonry/corporate greed/wetback votes/Mexican drugs/JFK (Prescott Bush), well then, I guess you'd be
shamed into drug use as a escape.
Don't worry druggies, Johnny
"Licks Bush's Butt"
Sutton is
letting all the drugs you will EVER need into this country for the Bush/Clinton family!




Authority on subject x, L says accept statement p.
p is outside the scope of subject x.
p is true.
D. Many advertising campaigns are build on this fallacy. Popular sports figures,
musicians, or actors endorse products and, in proper context, this fact is
offered as a reason we should use those products.
2. The United States policy toward mainland China was surely mistaken because
Shirley McLaine, the well known actress, said, at the time, she had grave
misgivings about it.
B. To qualify as an authority, the individual must be generally recognized by
peers in the same field when the peers hold a similar view. (Examine, for
yourself, why this condition is not an instance of the ad populum fallacy.)
B. Although the following passages are considered fallacies by a popular logic
textbook, note why they are not fallacious.
1. "But can you doubt that air has weight when you have the clear testimony of
Aristotle affirming that all the elements have weight including air, and
excepting only fire?" (Galileo Galilei, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences)
![]()
Business of
Global Warming Feels a Lot Like
Inquisition
![]()
: