CALCONCO
![]()
![]()


"What has past is past, what has passed can be repealed" - Burke
HERE WE
Since 1947, there is mostly likely the possibility that this nation
has, through guilt tripping young, poor women into unneeded
abortions, and even with the 18 years of the "baby boom,"
systematically murdered more than: 100,000,000 poor children and
counting! YOU READ THAT RIGHT,
AND THE BUSHES (PRESCOTT) GAVE US EUGENICS,
BIRTH CONTROL LEAGUES, and [drum roll] PLANNED PARENTHOOD. NOW OBAMA, the
CLINTONS, EDWARDS, GORE, KERRY, KENNEDYS (YOU KNOW, ALL
THE RICH FOLKS OF BOTH PARTIES!) WANT TO EXPAND IT TO
KILL OFF ALL THOSE DEEMED AS POOR, UNTOUCHABLE,
AND POTENTIALLY A CRIMINAL BY THE PROFILE OF THEIR
ECONOMIC CLASS!
## THIS MESSAGE IS REPEATED:
Throughout this site (and the Pro-Natal sub-page) you will see us use
60,000,000 babies murdered since Roe v. Wade in 1973 and might think
that number is hyperbole. But this year Planned Parenthood reported
that abortions were DOWN to 1.2-1.8 million babies for the last
year, like that was a good thing! Do the math, Bush, Osama,
Hilly, if the AVERAGE was 2 million (low end) since 1973 and 35
years are in the past, well that is 70,000,000 mostly white, but many
innocent (Say 15,000,000! Talk about a Diaspora/Holocaust) black babies murdered in the name of genocide against the poor by
Bush/Clinton/Obama/Reformed Jewish/Democrats. So 60,000,000-70,000,000 is a LOW figure and is
probably around 100,000,000 since WWII as stated below.
Oh,
read on and see just who brought us PLANNED PARENTHOOD, EUGENICS,
and THE AMERICAN BIRTH CONTROL LEAGUE -- after profiting like
the Kennedys, Fords, Rockefellers, Gores and Talmudic bankers, did
from the Nazis in WWII -- along with that liberal psycho
Margaret Sanger!!
Any guess? Huh? Read the section under BUSHICANS!
The true number of abortions since WWII in this so-called
greatest nation on Earth, is probably close to
100,000,000, or 1/3rd of our population murdered. True
Leninist/Trotskyites there really are in Greenwich Village!
Be very afraid,
this ranks Obama/Clinton/Liberals/Feminists and Progressive Jews with the Nazis, Islamic-Jihadist
and Talmudic Communists of Democrats/Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin/Mao/Pot.##
John Edwards, a pettifogger worth about
Roe v. Wade, etc. is the reason we are in this
mess with the Bushicans!
Dizzy Liz just gave the speech to [drum roll]
Planned Parenthood. SEE BELOW -- under the BUSHICANS -- to find out who helped start eugenics,
birth control, and Planned Parenthood in the USA!
Translation: Rich Democrats or Republicans alike think that poor people, and single women
don't need help in having or properly raising the baby.
No, no, no, just kill the innocent baby and your lives will be better! Way to go Looney Liz,
your kid dies cause he can't drive stoned and you want to kill more of us.
Better moveon.org over Hillary "Chained Heat" Clinton, there's another nut rolling on
the ground!
READ THIS:
(From
www.worldnetdaily.com)
A letter to Bill Clinton written by the co-counsel who successfully argued the
Roe v. Wade decision urged the then-president-elect to "eliminate the barely
educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country" by liberalizing abortion
laws. [SIDEBAR: A federal judge, a Clinton liberal appointee, threw out
McCorvey's case saying"too much time had passed" if you can believe that liberal
white-wash. As we have written before, maybe the same thing can be said to Dred
Scott or Anne Frank.]
Fin.
PRAVDA: You are poor or religious? Go away, only the rich
liberals should be allowed
to procreate! Gee, I suppose offering a pro-natal alternative never quite caught
their mind. Unless they are wetbacks of course.
Click the pro-natal stork
just down the page and get the REAL pro-natal info on how to have that baby and
not KILL IT for JOHN and "Looney Liz" EDWARDS and BEIRUT OSAMA because they
think it reduces crime and poverty!
Later, when a liberal Judge said too
much time had past to change Roe v. Wade I wondered how
Dred Scott would have
reacted to that notion too?
Meanwhile, the pork keeps on coming to liberal lawyers and
lawmakers while the poor are screwed out of safe and fair housing, jobs,
education and a future. But there is always federally funded abortion thanks to
John and Sybil Edwards, Pelosi, the Clintons, Barney "Fits of Fury" Frank and
Beirut "H-bomb" Osama!
Democrats use abortion not for choice but to kill the children
of the poor in order to reduce their number and therefore, in their minds,
reduce poverty and crime. The result = 38,000, 000
(Updated, guess what? 20,000,000 illegal wetbacks was a typical
BUSH/CLINTON/DEMOCRAT lie!)
violent, socialist,
mostly Mexican
wetbacks.
At the end of the Clinton administration, news teams went into
Black "hoods" and asked how the last eight years has changed their lives. The
answer was almost universal: "Not a damn thing has changed. People are still on
drugs, getting shot, jobless, or in jail."
Eight years later,
and not a damn thing has
changed. If only they had had an abortion. I guess to much time has passed.
Don't you worry, good 'ole John and Liz Edwards, the Clintons, Mitt, Huck,
Thompson, and Beirut "H-bomb" Osama will get you one!

![]()
Roe attorney: Use abortion to 'eliminate poor'
In unearthed letter urged President-elect Clinton to 'reform' country
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: May 13, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Ron Weddington, who with his wife Sarah Weddington represented "Jane Roe," sent
the four-page letter to President Clinton's transition team before Clinton took
office in January 1993.
The missive turned up in an exhibit put together by the watchdog legal group
Judicial Watch, which has been researching the Clinton administration's policy
on the abortion drug RU-486, notes James Taranto in the Wall Street Journal's
Best of the Web.
Weddington told the president-elect: "I don't think you are going to go very far
in reforming the country until we have a better educated, healthier, wealthier
population."
He said the new leader can "start immediately to eliminate the barely educated,
unhealthy and poor segment of our country."
Weddington qualified his statement, saying, "No, I'm not advocating some sort of
mass extinction of these unfortunate people. Crime, drugs and disease are
already doing that. The problem is that their numbers are not only replaced but
increased by the birth of millions of babies to people who can't afford to have
babies.
"There, I've said it. It's what we all know is true, but we only whisper it,
because as liberals who believe in individual rights, we view any program which
might treat the disadvantaged differently as discriminatory, mean-spirited and
... well ... so Republican."
Weddington explained he was "not proposing that you send federal agents armed
with Depo-Provera dart guns to the ghetto. You should use persuasion rather than
coercion."
He points to President Clinton and his soon-to-be first lady Hillary Rodham
Clinton as the "perfect example."
"Could either of you have gone to law school and achieved anything close to what
you have if you had three or four or more children before you were 20?" he
asked. "No! You waited until you were established and in your 30's to have one
child. That is what sensible people do."
Later, Weddington took a shot at the "religious right."
"Having convinced the poor that they can't get out of poverty when they have all
those extra mouths to feed, you will have to provide the means to prevent the
extra mouths, because abstinence doesn't work. The religious right has had 12
years to preach its message. It's time to officially recognize that people are
going to have sex and what we need to do as a nation is prevent as much disease
and as many poor babies as possible."
Weddington then argued that with 30 million abortions up to that point since Roe
v. Wade was decided in 1973, America is a much better place.
"Think of all the poverty, crime and misery ... and then add 30 million unwanted
babies to the scenario," he said. "We lost a lot of ground during the
Reagan-Bush religious orgy. We don't have a lot of time left."
The lawyer also delved into biblical theology.
"The biblical exhortation to 'be fruitful and multiply' was directed toward a
small tribe, surrounded by enemies," he argued. "We are long past that. Our
survival depends upon our developing a population where everyone contributes. We
don't need more cannon fodder. We don't need more parishioners. We don't need
more cheap labor. We don't need more poor babies."
In his postscript, Weddington said: "I was co-counsel in Roe v. Wade, [and] have
sired zero children and one fetus, the abortion of which was recently recounted
by my ex-wife in her book, "A Question of Choice" (Grosset/Putnam, 1992) I had a
vasectomy in 1969 and have never had one moment of regret."
The Weddingtons divorced in 1974.
Their client in the 1973 case, Norma McCorvey, recently attempted to challenge
the ruling that struck down all state laws restricting abortion, arguing changes
in law and new scientific research make the prior decision "no longer just."
Commenting on a 2004 court ruling dismissing the challenge, Sarah Weddington
said those who filed it "got publicity but the publicity actually has been very
helpful for those of us who believe the government should not be involved."
After announcement of McCorvey's challenge, Weddington received about two dozen
offers to help defend the Roe decision.
![]()
![]()
![]()